Re: JDBC transactions

At 18:05 +0200 on 7/1/98, Peter T Mount wrote:


> PS: in the current implementation, con.setAutoCommit(false) itself
> initiates the transaction, not the next sql call.

Ah, good of you to reveal this! This would mean that I would have to call
it again if I want another transaction to start after I've committed the
first.

Herouth

--
Herouth Maoz, B.Sc.                Work:      herouth@oumail.openu.ac.il
                                   Home:       herutma@telem.openu.co.il
HOME PAGE:                             http://www.cs.bgu.ac.il/~herouth/
Internet technical assistant              Open University, Telem Project